OPEN HOURS MON–FRI | 9AM–6PM
Mitsubishi Outlander, Outlander Sport, Mirage, or Eclipse Cross defects in California? Margarian Law has handled 6,000+ lemon law cases. Free case review.
Mitsubishi sells a smaller U.S. lineup than most major manufacturers, but the brand has been the subject of NHTSA recalls and recurring defect patterns on the Outlander, Outlander Sport, Mirage, and Outlander PHEV. If you purchased or leased a Mitsubishi in California that continues to have problems after multiple repair attempts under warranty, you may be entitled to relief under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Margarian Law has focused exclusively on automotive consumer protection for 20 years, with over $400 million recovered for clients across California.
Each page lists that model's documented defects, its full NHTSA recall history, and what they mean for a California lemon-law claim.
The recurring, documented problem areas across the lineup — the patterns behind many California claims.
Reported CVT transmission complaints (shared Alliance engineering with Nissan); Outlander PHEV also subject to NHTSA recall activity for high-voltage battery management software defects.
Reported CVT shudder and hesitation, infotainment failures, and recurring electrical issues.
Reported low-power and acceleration concerns, plus electrical and HVAC defects across recent model years.
Reported CVT complaints, infotainment defects, and electrical issues across 2018–2023 model years.
Takata airbag inflator recall coverage on older Mitsubishi models. All claims sourced from NHTSA recall and complaint data.
Settled Margarian Law cases on Mitsubishi vehicles, published with the actual settlement math.
California's Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act requires a manufacturer to repurchase or replace a vehicle it cannot repair after a reasonable number of attempts under warranty. If your Mitsubishi qualifies, the manufacturer — not you — pays the attorney fees.
Tell us what the dealer hasn't been able to fix. We'll tell you if you have a case — for free.
Recent Mitsubishi lemon law claims in California have most frequently involved Outlander CVT transmission complaints, Outlander PHEV high-voltage battery and software defects, Outlander Sport infotainment issues, Mirage low-power and electrical concerns, and shared Takata airbag recall coverage on older models. Whether any of these qualifies in your specific case depends on your repair history and warranty status.
California lemon law claims are filed against Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The process typically begins with gathering all repair orders, confirming warranty status, and documenting the defect history. An attorney who focuses on lemon law can evaluate whether your case qualifies, prepare a formal demand, and represent you through negotiation or litigation if necessary.
An active recall does not automatically make your Mitsubishi a lemon, and it does not bar a lemon law claim. If the recall repair does not fully resolve the problem, or if the defect existed and went unresolved despite repair attempts, the recall history can actually strengthen a lemon law claim by documenting the defect.
When a lemon law claim is successful under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, the manufacturer is responsible for paying the consumer's reasonable attorney fees and costs separately, in addition to the recovery. This means qualified Mitsubishi consumers can pursue representation at no out-of-pocket cost when their case is successful.
Mitsubishi is part of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, and Mitsubishi CVT transmissions share some engineering and supplier components with Nissan CVTs. While the specific defect patterns and class-action coverage have differed, reports of CVT shudder, hesitation, and failure have appeared in both brands. If your Mitsubishi has experienced repeated CVT-related repair attempts without lasting resolution, you may have a California lemon law claim.
In a Mitsubishi lemon law buyback under California law, Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. repurchases your vehicle and refunds the purchase price, less a statutory usage fee based on the mileage at the time the defect was first reported. The typical recovery may include reimbursement of payments made, payoff of the remaining loan or lease balance, sales tax, registration fees, finance charges, and documented out-of-pocket costs. Specific amounts depend on the facts of your case, and there is no guarantee of any particular result.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has been the subject of NHTSA complaint activity and recall activity covering high-voltage battery management software defects. If your Outlander PHEV has experienced repeated charging failures, battery warning lights, or software-related power loss that Mitsubishi has been unable to resolve, you may have a California lemon law claim under the Song-Beverly Act.
Timelines vary based on the strength of the documentation, Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.'s response, and whether the case settles or proceeds to litigation. Some cases resolve in a matter of months; others take longer. There is no guaranteed timeline.
Yes. California's Lemon Law covers both purchased and leased Mitsubishi vehicles, including Certified Pre-Owned, so long as the defect appears during the original manufacturer's warranty period and the other statutory requirements are met.
Compensations under California's Lemon Law may include a manufacturer buyback, a replacement vehicle, or a cash settlement, depending on the facts of your case. Recovery may also include reimbursement of related expenses, payoff of loan or lease balances, and attorney fees and costs paid separately by Mitsubishi when the case is successful. There is no guarantee of any particular outcome; results vary based on the facts of each matter.
A closer look at the Mitsubishi issues our attorneys have covered.
Skip to content
